1961 DAF Daffodil vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 773 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DAF Daffodil | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | DAF | Volvo |
| Model | Daffodil | V50 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1438 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2670 mm |
