1961 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | Daffodil | 6 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |