1961 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 364 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | DAF | Jaguar |
| Model | Daffodil | XJ |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2920 mm |
