1961 DKW Munga vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1963 Rover 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 96 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | DKW | Rover |
| Model | Munga | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 54 L |
