1961 DKW Munga vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1964 Nissan Cedric is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 31 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DKW Munga | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | DKW | Nissan |
Model | Munga | Cedric |
Year Released | 1961 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2540 mm |