1961 DKW Munga vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1980 Volvo 240 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 240 weights approximately 324 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DKW Munga | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | 240 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |