1961 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,746 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 48 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | Munga | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
