1961 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mini MK VI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 496 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mini MK VI. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DKW Munga | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | DKW | Mini |
Model | Munga | MK VI |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |