1961 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,835 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 694 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Munga | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2835 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2730 mm |
