1961 DKW Munga vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 150 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | Midge |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
