1961 DKW Munga vs. 1998 Ford Contour
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (195 HP @ 6625 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Contour weights approximately 295 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Contour. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 1998 Ford Contour | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Contour |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2544 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6625 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5625 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1411 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 54 L |
