1961 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 61 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | Munga | Clio |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2480 mm |
