1961 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,191 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Volkswagen Lupo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 262 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2000 Volkswagen Lupo | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | Munga | Lupo |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1191 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 19.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 854 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 34 L |
