1961 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1098 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Munga | ML |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 2214 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 83 L |
