1961 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2002 Ford Explorer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Explorer weights approximately 823 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DKW Munga | 2002 Ford Explorer | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Explorer |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 84.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1939 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 85 L |