1961 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 Smart ForTwo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1961 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 311 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DKW Munga | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | DKW | Smart |
Model | Munga | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 22 L |