1961 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 349 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DKW Munga | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 6 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |