1961 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 465 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2005 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1581 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2930 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
