1961 DKW Munga vs. 2008 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Rover 25 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 25 (83 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 31 kg more than 2008 Rover 25.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2008 Rover 25 | |
| Make | DKW | Rover |
| Model | Munga | 25 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |
