1961 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 144 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2009 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 132 L |
