1961 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (301 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1370 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | DKW | Land Rover |
| Model | Munga | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 2486 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 88 L |
