1961 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Sable (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 809 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2009 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Sable |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 12.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 78 L |
