1961 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Munga | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 61 L |
