1961 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Micra (88 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 126 kg more than 2010 Nissan Micra.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | DKW | Nissan |
| Model | Munga | Micra |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 18.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 46 L |
