1961 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 70 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DKW Munga | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 2 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 43 L |