1961 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 179 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DKW Munga | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | DKW | Suzuki |
| Model | Munga | Equator |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |
