1961 Dodge Polara vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Dodge Polara weights approximately 355 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Polara | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
