1961 Dodge Polara vs. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 244 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara.
Because 1961 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Polara | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1769 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2900 mm |
