1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Dodge Polara weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Polara | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2600 mm |
