1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2002 Acura CL. (260 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 55 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara.
Because 1961 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Dodge Polara | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Dodge | Acura |
Model | Polara | CL |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5907 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2580 mm |