1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1961 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1961 Dodge Polara.
Because 1961 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 2002 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Dodge | Lincoln |
| Model | Polara | Continental |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 410 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
