1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Dodge Polara weights approximately 405 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Polara | 3 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2650 mm |
