1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2008 Mazda 2
To start off, 2008 Mazda 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Dodge Polara weights approximately 196 kg more than 2008 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 2008 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Polara | 2 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2500 mm |
