1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 518 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Dodge Polara | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Polara | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5907 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2950 mm |