1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (151 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara.
Because 1961 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Dodge Polara | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Polara | 5 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5907 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1760 mm |