1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (360 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1961 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1961 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 333 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Dodge | Chrysler |
| Model | Polara | 300 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1858 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4999 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3048 mm |
