1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1961 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1961 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1001 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Dodge Polara | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Polara | Expedition |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5907 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2526 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3023 mm |