1961 Dodge Polara vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 537 kg more than 1961 Dodge Polara.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-09 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Dodge Polara | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Polara | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5907 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2875 mm |
