1961 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 984 kg more than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (188 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Fiat Grand Break | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Break | Armada |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2279 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 106 L |
