1961 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 235 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Fiat Grand Break | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Grand Break | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 48 L |