1961 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 152 kg more than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (188 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Fiat Grand Break | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Grand Break | Armada |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2279 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 106 L |