1961 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (124 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 27 kg more than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Fiat Grand Break (188 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (155 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1961 Fiat Grand Break will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Fiat Grand Break | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Fiat | Kia |
Model | Grand Break | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2279 cc | 1591 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 85.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1317 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 53 L |