1961 Ford Cortina vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (160 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1961 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Ford Cortina.
Because 1961 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Cortina | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cortina | 3 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2850 mm |