1961 Ford Cortina vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Cortina | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Cortina | S40 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2650 mm |