1961 Ford Cortina vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Cortina | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Cortina | Matrix |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2600 mm |