1961 Ford Taunus vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1961 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1961 Ford Taunus.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Taunus | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Taunus | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 90 L |