1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1953 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1961 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 265 kg more than 1961 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Thunderbird | 1953 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Ford | Humber |
| Model | Thunderbird | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6638 cc | 4138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 339 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |
