1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1962 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1962 Lincoln Continental is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1962 Lincoln Continental. (300 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1962 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 453 kg more than 1961 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Ford Thunderbird | 1962 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Thunderbird | Continental |
Year Released | 1961 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6638 cc | 7043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2328 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 90 L |