1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 1996 Volvo 850 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 850. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 382 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Thunderbird | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Thunderbird | 850 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6638 cc | 2461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 339 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1493 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |
