1961 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Kia Retona
To start off, 2002 Kia Retona is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 2002 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 3 kg more than 2002 Kia Retona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Kia Retona | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Thunderbird | Retona |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6638 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 339 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1872 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2370 mm |
